Marketers often complain about a lack of budget, yet the same marketers invest significant portions of their limited resources into things that don't work.
Instead, look at how much of your marketing budget is going into these kinds of activities that produce virtually no impact.
Sure, things like Content Syndication raise awareness on broad channels but in most companies the impact to revenue is little (with or even without attribution).
Same marketing budget, entirely different impact on revenue, profitability and enterprise value creation.
As a marketing leader, you are a financial steward for the business. This means you have a fiduciary responsibility to invest your marketing dollars wisely.
This means dealing with your marketing budget should follow the same principles as when you deal with your own money.
Some obvious rules:
1) Don't spend money on things that are purely cost centers with no ROI.
2) Don't be too prudent or careful and miss opportunities to capture value.
3) Always actively think about where to invest your limited resources more effectively.
Too many marketing budgets burn cash / capital from founders or investors because it doesn't feel like your own money.
But it really is your own money. It's the capital at your disposal to grow the company and the team, and it is your mechanism to helping more customers the more efficient you are.
Treat it as such and operate this way. Your CFO and CEO will become your biggest fans and supporters.
Understanding the true value of revenue and profit generated is the key to knowing how much to invest in Marketing.
If your LTV of a client is 10 years and you’re not cash strapped, being willing to increase your CAC payback period to 18-24 months can drastically increase your speed to acquire customers.
While financial stewardship is critical to scale, knowing when to step on the gas can lead to significant gains.
This is when Marketing can do things like:
-Building much more brand awareness at the top of the funnel
-Invest heavily in content to generate long-term returns
-Scale paid media to outbid the competition that has more stringent cash constraints
Similarly, realizing that generating EBITDA has a 15x (likely more) multiple on exit / fundraising round can change how you view Marketing investment.
Short-term thinking may view this as conserving EBITDA for higher valuations. Long-term thinking looks at long-term EBITDA creation.
If payback periods are expanded to 18-24...
A common misconception inside companies is that Demand Gen purely refers to one sub-domain of marketing (e.g. paid media or ABM).
Examples of mistakes inside these companies:
-Content and Demand Gen teams are separated inside marketing and operate almost independently
-Some activities get way more of the funding than others -- this is why some companies over-index on Events while spending nothing on Paid Media
-The team lacks skill sets to deliver on the other areas of demand gen (e.g. SEO or Customer Marketing or Product Marketing)
-The team is not revenue-driven and is constantly distracted by the organizations needs for other activities (e.g. Sales Enablement, Corporate Comms) that do anything but drive demand.
What this thinking misses is that Demand Generation is the overall outcome of all kinds of marketing activities coming together.
ABM alone is not Demand Gen.
Paid Media alone is not Demand Gen.
SEO alone is not Demand Gen.
Nurture Content alone is not Demand Gen
It's not Paid vs. Content. It's Paid + Content.
Paid Media without content hits diminishing returns. Content without Paid caps out its distribution even after finding an audience.
Paid + Content finds infinite scale through increased distribution.
Examples of plays on paid social that companies should be running today:
1) Promoting an ungated educational piece of content to drive awareness / traffic from ICPs on paid social platforms.
2) Doing paid social "PR" where you promote new product releases, partnerships, capabilities the way you would use a wire service but instead use paid social as your distribution platform.
3) Nurture campaigns on paid social where prospects in MCL / MQL / SAL / SQL stages see content in the form of promoted content or ads on Facebook and LinkedIn instead of just email nurture programs.
These kinds of campaigns have poor ROI / CAC when looked at through the lens of traditional marketing metrics. But they're the new way to do marketing and inevitably...
Focusing all company efforts around resolving the pain points of 1 customer drastically increases the odds of success.
This is why some of the biggest companies are often started by people trying to scratch their own itch (e.g. Basecamp).
An effort like this involves:
1) Product teams clearly defining the person all features and roadmap items need to solve for.
2) Service teams clearly identifying areas to support new and existing customers on their journey.
3) Sales teams clearly mapping out the ideal buying persona and targeting them with focused outreach.
4) Marketing teams clearly outlining the messaging, content and distribution required to reach that ideal persona.
Focusing on one specific person may seem like it has a huge opportunity cost. But the market size of solving a very specific problem for one specific person is almost always a lot larger than you think.
The exercise also opens up adjacencies that were previously invisible.
For some reason, IT departments have authority over what marketing tools are chosen inside some companies.
"We think you need to switch from HubSpot to Dynamics because we are getting a bundle on our Teams / Office / Azure package."
Why this makes no sense:
1) Switching Marketing systems because you're getting bundled pricing from a vendor is asking for your Marketing team to fail to meet their pipeline targets.
2) Shows how little authority some Marketing teams have inside their organizations when systems they use every day are being chosen by other departments who have no understanding of the day-to-day reality of the function.
3) Demand generation and growth is the primary objective. Capturing cost efficiencies on bundled pricing is not.
4) Avoid infrastructure / switching system projects at all costs. (If you're on Dynamics, don't switch to HubSpot just because either).
The most common reason VPs of Marketing / CMOs are fired in their first 12-18 months is that they blow their political capital on things like:
-Building a new website
-Adding more tech to their marketing stack
NONE of these things actually do what the marketing leader is hired for: to grow demand.
What should be focused on in the first few quarters on the job:
1) Nailing doing messaging and positioning
2) Creating more high quality content
3) Ramping up distribution across all platforms
The end goal of all of these being: generate more pipeline and close more deals.
For bonus marks: improve data tracking and board reporting (this doesn't matter if there isn't more pipeline to report on).
Too many companies start their GTM planning based on Search Volume instead of their Ideal Customer Profile.
If a term has 10 searches a month, search-driven marketers will ignore the content asset required for that item on the roadmap. This is the classic hammer looking for a nail scenario.
In a Google Search driven world, the approach has some validity. But we don't live in a search driven world.
When you start with ICP, you build content based on what will help your ICP resolve their biggest pain points. Only then do you think about distribution.
In a social-driven world where search volume is not the north star, GTM planning then focuses on finding the right channel / platform where the ICP can be found with the right message.
It may turn out that you end up on search through this approach anyways, but you're far more likely to end up with the right outcome at all times.
One of the biggest ways in which Sales and Marketing can make an impact is by collecting of feedback from the market and by communicating / championing that feedback to product teams.
This is how:
1) Major roadblocks in the sales process are overcome
2) Critical missing features impacting close rates are uncovered
3) Ideal pricing structures are created to be in alignment with customer interests
4) Growth opportunities to scale are found (e.g. additional products and services requested by customers)
Having a formalized feedback mechanism to channel this input to product teams can create significant ROI on Marketing and Sales well beyond standard Go-To-Market activities.