Episode 149:Â Jesse Bendit of Apax Digital on
Building an In-House Operating Team
Â
On this episode
Jesse Bendit, Principal at Apax Digital, joins the show to unpack how a private equity firm builds and funds a 30-person internal operating team without letting it become bloated. Learn why a pull model beats a push model for utilization, how staying concentrated in 15 to 20 investments per fund lets a team build real sector depth, and how that depth shows up during diligence, not just after close.
Hear why trust—rather than traditional SEO signals—is the new currency of visibility as search moves into LLMs. Plus, learn how to separate genuine AI risk from AI opportunity in a portfolio company, including why seat-based SaaS pricing is losing its power as a value proxy and how deep data and integration advantages can make AI a moat rather than a threat.
Â
The information contained in this podcast is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice.
Click to view transcript
Episode Transcript  Â
00:02:49.380 — 00:02:51.500 · Speaker 1
All right, Jesse, welcome to the show. How's it going?
00:02:51.660 — 00:02:53.180 · Speaker 2
Good. Thanks for having me.
00:02:53.260 — 00:02:58.280 · Speaker 1
Yeah. Excited to have you on. So why don't we start with your background and Apax Digital and then let's go from there.
00:02:58.960 — 00:04:28.970 · Speaker 2
Yeah, sure. So, uh, I've been at Apax for about 11 years now in a few different areas. Um, I've been at Apax Digital for the last six years, and I'll kind of explain the differences between Apax and Apax Digital, but Apax have been around for 50 years. It's been one of the early investors in tech and, uh, early stage businesses.
The firm has changed over the years and has a late stage buyout practice. And I sit in the digital Fund, which is our $2 billion growth oriented fund. So we're investing in leading tech and tech enabled services businesses, and we get to leverage the broader Apax platform and everything that comes with that to help companies that are really at inflection stages of growth and help them accelerate into that next phase.
So, you know, our fund, we're doing minority majority checks. We'll do $75 to $250 million of equity. Um, primary, secondary. We're we're very flexible on the structure. And the reason for that is we're concentrated in the number of investments and want to be a real partner. Um, and so we are more agnostic in what that capital looks like.
Apax broadly, we have international investments. And, um, we also bring a lot of industry expertise and focus on specific sectors. Um, and then we take a very operating mindset. So we have 30 internal operators. These are practice area specialists. Um, because we want to be a partner on the journey. Um, not just silent capital.
00:04:29.170 — 00:04:36.250 · Speaker 1
Got it. And you mentioned that you guys do minority and majority investments. So like what determines that or what types of businesses are you looking for?
00:04:36.650 — 00:07:23.010 · Speaker 2
Yeah, often it's honestly what, uh, the management teams or the existing investors are looking for and situational. Right. Some some businesses are at a stage of growth where they're born at burning more capital. Um, they have primary investors and minority investors who want to remain on for the ride, but they're looking for that next stage of investor who has some of the capabilities.
We have have seen companies at a larger scale to take on a new minority position and provide primaries so they can continue to invest in that growth. Some companies are a bit more mature. They have investors who are looking to fully exit, and we come in to be that that majority partner and help guide on that stage of growth.
The beauty of what we do is because we can be flexible. It allows us to situationally be responsive to whatever the investors, management or other parties are looking for. And then we can also be thoughtful around what is the best type of capital for these businesses. You know, some that makes sense, some it doesn't.
Some primary capital is needed, some it's not, and some are looking for the optionality to say, you know, we don't want primary today, but we might do M&A down the road. We want the funding for that. And and we can be super flexible. What we're looking for you know I mentioned we're pretty concentrated. So we'll do 15 to 20 investments per fund.
We don't want people sitting on ten plus boards. We don't think we can be properly focused if we're spending our time across so many different companies. Um, so typically we're looking at, you know, 3 to 5 boards per, per team member. And the idea is each of us has areas we focus on. We want to really know those industries, know the people that are involved, have experts that we work with and have real theses around those industries to know what categories we're looking for when we come in.
That helps us align much better to say here opportunities we see what are the opportunities you see as a team and really add value as a thought partner versus just, you know, going along with whatever, you know, the company might be doing at that given time. So we want to be selective. We want to add value outside of just the capital.
I think I said that earlier, but we typically are the investor who you know, wants to not have a thesis outside of what the existing operating model is. So we want to have our own thoughts around value levers we can pull. Um, we want to have those conversations with the management team during diligence and say, here are three areas we think we can accelerate.
Actually, here's how we've done it before. You know, here are examples of where we might be helpful. And that's usually where we think we can deliver returns that that might be differentiated.
00:07:23.050 — 00:07:34.050 · Speaker 1
How do you approach investments where you are a minority investor versus a majority investor? Obviously you have different levels of control there. Does your approach change significantly between those two types of investments?
00:07:34.530 — 00:09:24.670 · Speaker 2
Yes and no. So, uh, look, when you're in a minority seat and often there's a handful of investors that have voices on a board. And so navigating that, speaking up when we actually do have expertise and information is important, but also knowing when to defer to others with expertise and where other people might have examples or portfolio companies or third parties they work with that are more relevant.
You know, I sit on on as an observer on one board where we're one of many different minority of investors. We've been in it for, uh, for five years now, and others are coming in more recently. Some of those that come in more recently have new ideas, and those are often really beneficial and help add that value.
We also have some more context because we've been involved for five years and have seen it go through different phases and understand the market in a different way just from having that that experience over time. On majority deals, you know, there's lots of voices in the room. So it's more important, um, to bring as much of the capabilities as we can.
Um, there's less people to, to really rely on outside of ourselves. Um, so often that means a bit more involvement. Management teams might lean on us a bit more, regardless of minority or majority, though. You know, I mentioned the operating team. I mentioned keeping ourselves concentrated in the board.
We give companies the menu of options of what Apax can offer. So we have specialists on the operating team who all they do is SEO, and we have people who all they do is SEO. We have data scientists carve out specialists, pricing experts, and so all of our portfolio companies know the resources we have. And then it's their job to to pull on us.
We we always say we're a pull, not a push model. We want to make ourselves available as much as needed. Um, but it's availability, not prescriptive.
00:09:24.910 — 00:09:37.190 · Speaker 1
Talk about that team of operating experts, because that's larger than most firms have on staff. So how does the model work? And are you billing out to your portfolio companies or is it funded by Apax? Just help us understand that.
00:09:37.430 — 00:11:19.980 · Speaker 2
Yeah. So it's totally funded by Apax. Our investors pay for this. And we paid for this because we think it adds value above and beyond what we could do otherwise. So it's good for us. It's good for the companies. Um, and we think it, it, you know actually adds in returns for ourselves and everybody involved.
Um, the way that it started was the, the current CEO in the US was in the C-suite at Orbitz and Priceline. So he had a very digital demand gen type background. And so when he came over to Apax, that was the first capability. He added. And what we found is that portfolio companies wanted to use that expertise.
Um, and then kept asking for more areas of expertise. So that team has grown over time based on the demand of our portfolio companies. So, you know, starting with that digital demand gen side, it moved into rev ops and data science. And now AI experts, product experts, infrastructure experts. Cybersecurity is a big topic these days.
So we have a person who just focuses on that. And so each of these people are really the best at what they do. They're they're people who are in the sweet spot of their career where they have the experience and they're still really energized to get involved. And there are people that have that practice area versus general consulting knowledge, because we want them to be as much of a resource as possible.
So that can be a 15 minute conversation. It can be working alongside management teams, uh, on a six, nine month engagement. And we really want that to be a model that they can use as needed. I mentioned the pull model, but that's that's really how that team functions.
00:11:20.260 — 00:12:00.070 · Speaker 1
Got it. Yeah. I guess the tricky part there is that, you see, you're mentioning a lot of different areas that these guys can help in. But at the same time, like I'm imagining almost all your portfolio companies need help with a bunch of these areas. Like we found that a lot of our partners, they have a handful of operating folks.
And then as they figure out that there's a certain area that needs help, they need to kind of dive deep. And then that's usually when they're bringing partners like us in for different subject areas. So help us understand that. Like, how are you able to dive deep with the portfolio company, with the team.
Are you adding more resources or are these subject matter experts almost like deploying themselves into the the specific investment where there's an opportunity? Like how does that model work?
00:12:00.590 — 00:13:36.960 · Speaker 2
Yeah, I mean, it's a it's a great question. Every person only has a finite amount of time. And so I think the first thing is that within portfolio companies, we help prioritize what the most important areas are that that there's value to be gained. And so our team does need to prioritize within their own initiatives where they're going to be most focused.
I think you hit on something else that's super relevant. You work with a lot of PE companies. We work with third party experts too, right? So we build a bunch of third parties that we think are the best at what they do. And where our team can be really helpful is in bringing the context from an investment thesis perspective.
Bring the context from knowing the portfolio company and the team, and then bring the context from having work with those third parties before and really bridging that gap to make everyone as effective as possible in that relationship. No situation is the same. So, you know, not every third party is right for every situation.
But knowing the context from those different areas allows us to to think strategically about where this company sits, what is most effective and translate that to, to partners that could be useful. So that helps to build the leverage, the operating leverage within our teams that it's not one person who's responsible for, you know, 60 plus portfolio companies.
And saying cybersecurity is a big topic. Everybody needs to be focused on it. You know, one guy can't manage that big of a of a portfolio. But through our additional resources, partners, experts, we're really able to use that knowledge base to to get our portfolio companies what they need.
00:13:37.280 — 00:14:09.970 · Speaker 1
How does the operational model work? Can you expand a little bit more, because a lot of investors and GPs are hesitant to invest so much in operating teams, and we've even seen firms that have scaled up large operating teams and then scaled down in recent years, where just there's a lot of fixed costs and overhead associated with that.
So how does that work, especially when you have this more of a pull model than a push model where the companies can select into these services? Right. How are you making sure there's enough utilization, enough impact from this team. And the ROI is actually there for the firm?
00:14:10.290 — 00:16:19.360 · Speaker 2
Yeah. I mean, look, when I joined 11 years ago, I think the team was 12 at that point. It's it's 30 today. So we haven't seen it. It go up and go back down because as I said, you know, there's more and more areas that are our portfolio companies are asking for and we want to deliver that to that. There's the anecdotal side right.
Like when I, I ended up being seconded at Boats Group and then working there full time, that was the portfolio company I worked with. There were super tangible areas where I had never been in an operating role before. I had a lot of good connections on the operating team, and I was dealing with issues like affiliate marketing.
I didn't know how to start that program. There were people within the team that I could ask about, ask what? What programs they were working with, think about the economics of it and help get it set up. And they had that experience. They had that knowledge. So that's like the anecdotal side. The realistic way we measure it is, you know, that team is super data driven.
So they track their hours, their projects, where they're working, where they're spending time, and then they're reporting back to to board members. And those of us that that are involved with the company on a regular basis and saying, here we are on the project, this is what's delivered. This is what the expectation was, and this is where we are today.
And we're able to measure that within the company. Right. Um, we have one initiative right now at a company I work with, DLRdmv. They historically haven't had a BI business intelligence program, and we were able to introduce them to a third party partner. Um, that partner was able to to step in and really guide them on setting up their Snowflake instance, using Claude on top of that, and other programs to create outputs and and visibility.
And they were able to do that in a lot less time than the business could have done it by itself. Um, so you see that you see that in reporting that we're, we're getting now from DLRdmv, we're seeing that and the ability to really track their revenue and customers. And that's reported back to the team in terms of where they spent time, what resources they used and what was effective.
00:16:19.680 — 00:16:40.360 · Speaker 1
Yeah, yeah, I think I think I think that's great. I think the fact that people are getting involved at that level and are able to support these companies. Do you think there's like an advantage that you guys have given that you have this team in terms of the amount of alpha you can generate because of the subject matter expertise that you've built on this team, compared to firms that maybe don't have a lot of these capabilities in-house.
00:16:40.920 — 00:18:35.260 · Speaker 2
So it's hard for me to compare not having worked at Another firm on the investment side, but I like to think, yes, in kind of two respects. First of all, when we're doing diligence, often we can find areas that others might not find. You know, I imagine Boats Group where I went to work. That's a perfect example.
You know, we took a thesis there that it was a family owned business. It had a great market share. It had a great brand within the marine industry, but they hadn't invested in the business. They didn't have a true dedicated team. They weren't putting dollars, reinvesting in technology and product and customer outreach.
And it had historically been a print business that moved online, and they had never really gotten that digital DNA. And we saw a huge opportunity to invest in digital marketing, in demand gen, in using the brand to really accelerate traffic growth. Um, and to actually use the opportunities they have to to see financial results and financial performance.
That wouldn't have been possible if we didn't have that dedicated, digitally focused team within our operating practice. So they they, in the diligence side identified that. And then on the operating side, once we invested, were able to actually help the team execute on that in the short term by by being much more involved and regular calls and cadence in the long term.
We hired people internally within Boats Group who had that expertise and could really take it on themselves and were able to advise on who those right people are, because we are bridging that gap. So that's a perfect example where we can identify it in diligence and then execute on it when we actually make the investment.
And as I said, because we're concentrated, we can pick opportunities where we actually see that value add. It doesn't it doesn't hold true across every industry, in every company. And that's why we're selective in what we cover and how our groups and verticals break down.
00:18:35.380 — 00:19:17.800 · Speaker 1
Yeah, I can totally see that. Like in a lot of private equity investments, there is a bit of a disconnect between what's happening in diligence in the value creation planning and then actually rolling that out. Post close like is the same team working on it as they're like a connecting person or group in between that.
Like we get pulled into diligence engagements and we kind of help firms from the outside. But then in firms where there isn't an internal person kind of running that process, sometimes things can get lost. So so that definitely resonates. Has this been a differentiator when you've been out there trying to close investments or trying to close targets and to say like, hey, this is what we can bring to the table as Apax to help you get the most out of this investment for the next turn.
00:19:18.320 — 00:21:20.860 · Speaker 2
Yeah. And we get the question often, like, who is the team on this post investment? And the reality is, is that it's the same people who are involved during the diligence period that are involved throughout the investment whole period. And so us on the investment team, we sit on the board. We're kind of that central repository of information to say these are the priorities of the business.
This is what we're talking in the board meeting. And then we can also help get them connected to the right people in the operating team or third parties we work with, or other portfolio companies that are having the same problem or running into the same questions. That consistency, I think, is is really important and a differentiator when we talk to portfolio companies and then introducing a lot of our partners or operating professionals, I think really resonates with with a lot of the management teams, they see that often these are companies, especially at the Apax Digital size, that have reached scale by being really scrappy.
Often they're bootstrapped. Um, they've they've managed to build a really nice product market fit from a, a, a less resource heavy base. But when they see our capabilities and how we've seen companies from 10 million of revenue up until our buyout fund has companies that are a billion plus of EBITDA. And we know where where landmines can be, where skeletons can be hidden.
and our operators can talk about that at different phases. I think that resonates really well. To be able to say, you know, when you get to this scale, you need to put it in this system. These are his systems. We recommend. We just put one of those in in DLRdmv. You know, these are BI tools we've used in the past.
These are partners that can help you get it set up. These are often the issues that people run into when they're getting them set up. Um, we can talk about that during the diligence stage. And I think that management teams appreciate having having a bit of a I wouldn't say a crutch, but resources they could use that are free and they otherwise would not have available.
00:21:22.220 — 00:22:39.930 · Speaker 1
We'll get back to the show in just a moment. But before we do, one of the most common and important value creation levers that we hear about on this show, from private equity investors and our own PE partners, is go to market. Yet when these same PE partners bring us into their portfolio companies or new target investments that they're exploring.
We find that the marketing function is quite immature, underutilized and under optimized. And so that's a huge opportunity that we see inside these companies. And if you have a portfolio company that you feel like it'd scale a lot faster to drive more pipeline and revenue, or you're looking at a new investment where you feel like that could be core to your investment thesis.
But we'd love to explore that with you and figure out how we can partner with you to drive more enterprise value creation. On the marketing side, similar to the way that we've done with major PE firms like to OP data, HG, SDG, and many more. At this point, we've done hundreds of engagements across hundreds of industries and verticals, and we have a ton of benchmarks and frameworks that we bring to these engagements to help you drive as much enterprise value as quickly as possible.
So if that sounds like something that you might be interested in, you can just email me directly at howtosaas.com or go to our website and schedule a demo, and we'd love to speak with you about it further. And now with that said, let's get back to the show.
00:22:41.410 — 00:22:58.530 · Speaker 1
Is there an operational framework that you're using to figure out, like, hey, for this business or this investment, this is the biggest value creation lever or for this other investment. Here's where we should start. Like how are you determining where you deploy this team or which people are working on what here?
00:22:59.290 — 00:25:19.710 · Speaker 2
The real answer is we don't have a playbook. I know some some firms take the approach of having a playbook and, you know, it's pricing and cost cutting and those sorts of areas. That's that's really not our approach. We have an investment thesis when we when we go into each business. Right. And those are the things that will make or break whether it's a successful partnership.
Those investment theses are usually the ones that are going to drive the most value. And so you can often tie those to to where we need to focus with the business. If it's on the marketing side. You know, there are certain people who are going to be most relevant there if it's on the product side. We have experts who help think through roadmaps and how to prioritize and how to build the the the product development team around that.
If there are competitive dynamics, it's thinking about, you know, how we really differentiate ourselves in the market and across the business and across the go to market organization. So it really depends. And that changes over time too. Right. I mentioned I work with a company, Guesty. They are one of the leaders in short term rental property management software.
They had a great product for small and medium sized businesses when they first came about and really grew into that. As they've grown, they've started to serve enterprise customers. And and the market has changed as they've grown. Right. Like AI has become super relevant for all of our businesses. For that in particular, they have these customers that have very tasks, heavy jobs.
It's it's making sure that they have bookings and pricing and maintenance and cleaning. And so there's a real opportunity to add value to those customers through emphasizing the AI products that can build. That's a newer opportunity for them, right? Like that's come in the last few years, where customers understand that customers want to buy that and the value prop resonates.
And so that's been something that that we've looked to be an additional help on as they've built out that roadmap and really thought about the marketing for it, the product development for it, the pricing for it and the testing for it. So it changes over time. It depends on what the thesis is up front. And then we want to give the resources that that add the most value in terms of long term business success.
00:25:20.070 — 00:25:43.560 · Speaker 1
Yeah, that definitely resonates because obviously depending on the stage, depending on where companies are, different levers end up mattering. You touched on AI there. Can you expand on that and just explain, like with AI coming up and that has an opportunity in front of these companies, how are you approaching that or how is that like intertwining with all the other initiatives on the value creation side that you see in that you're helping these companies with?
00:25:43.960 — 00:27:53.070 · Speaker 2
Yeah, it's something we've been thinking about for a number of years as as have most others, obviously, within the last six months, uh, this continues to accelerate for good and that. Right. Uh, there was a huge selloff in software earlier this year, I think, for for good reason. Um, there's legitimate questions behind, uh, the software landscape.
You know, I think that's in the public markets. They reacted. Uh, I think the problem is that those sell offs were applied indiscriminately. So we're thinking about what the real risks are and what the real opportunities are. From the risk perspective, we look at every company as, and this is even before the AI conversation.
But can customers replace you. Are they going to build it yourself. And then now there's this path for AI native upstarts. Who's going to compete with you? Who's going to come in? And so we're always asking those questions from an analysis perspective at investment, but also afterwards to to make sure that we continue to have leadership in terms of the products we're delivering and ultimately in those products we're delivering.
The question we want to ask is, what value are you delivering to your customers? I think one of the reasons that there was a sell off in SaaS is because historically, SaaS is related to this, this seat based model, right? And as we continue to to evolve within this world, that will become less of the proxy for for value, how many seats you're delivering and how many people are using you versus what is the actual value you're adding.
So I mentioned before in terms of the agents they're building for their customers, that's adding tangible value. Their customers can now get more revenue because they are able to expand their operations, and they can get higher margin because they're able to do it more efficiently. And SaaS is enabling that if you're delivering that value to customers, then there's value to be had for the business.
And so that's what we're constantly getting our portfolio companies to focus on is, is how is this adding value. Um, to that end customer, so that you continue to, to be sticky for them and also continue to, to have greater and greater demand?
00:27:53.430 — 00:28:19.670 · Speaker 1
Yeah, yeah, I totally all of that resonates. I guess my question would be on the AI side, are you seeing more work that's being done inside these companies on the product side or on the go to market side? Because on our side, like what we are seeing is that companies are seeing declining paid media traffic and performance, declining SEO traffic.
So AI visibility is one of the biggest things that we are helping private equity firms and their portfolio companies with. I'm curious, like where do you see the biggest opportunities.
00:28:20.110 — 00:29:42.890 · Speaker 2
Realistically, both, but kind of touching on what you're describing. You know, we invest in marketplace businesses. The Google traffic has often been a the most important driver for a lot of those businesses, and Google was always based off of your content and your links and everything involved there.
People knew the formulas. I think more and more when you're looking at what was SEO, it translates to to what the new world of search is within LLMs. And that's trust ultimately, right? You have to be trusted by your customers. You have to be trusted by reviewers, and that gets you more visibility within the new version of discovery. And so I think it's only more important today to get companies to think about how they're continuing to enhance that trust, but also to make that trust clear to the market, because that's how they're found and that's how their reputation is built, and that's how people are doing research and finding their their software products and their partners today.
So I think it's a super relevant topic not only for our marketplace businesses, but for all of our business to be really that source of of information.
00:29:43.090 — 00:30:08.490 · Speaker 1
What about on the products that have you seen any dampened demand for companies in a world with AI, like we're hearing from some companies that customers are saying like, hey, we want to see how much we can leverage AI to build an in-house application or other alternatives to solutions that you can purchase off the shelf.
I'm just curious, like on the product side, or just demand overall for a category or type of type of product, what are you seeing there?
00:30:09.010 — 00:30:29.290 · Speaker 2
Again, this really depends on on what the business is. So I think when we make investments, we we have focused on a rubric of, of where that won't necessarily be the case. DLRdmv is a perfect example. Uh, basically they build electronic titling solutions for car dealerships,
00:30:30.390 — 00:32:35.610 · Speaker 2
Electronic titling is not the car dealerships core competency. They want to sell cars. Electronic titling is complex. You need to integrate with DMVs. You need to have each of 50 states. Uh, no. All the the the fees and the restrictions and the processes. There's thousands of jurisdictions in there.
A dealership is not going to want to build that themselves. I think pricing is key here. And we mentioned some companies do price per seat, DLRdmv prices per transaction. And so for every transaction the dealerships getting value, the consumer is getting value because they need the title. And so DLRdmv is taking the relevant value there.
So for a company like that the short answer is no. We're not seeing a decrease in demand. We're actually seeing continued growth momentum because customers are looking for the best product that is automated and has the best data and experience. Because of their data and experience, they're more accurate and they're better able to use products to automate their own, their own software.
So in those situations, I think the answer is no. We're not seeing less demand. I think customers are demanding you to innovate within your own product in those situations and say, I will look for something else if I need to, because I know that this is easier. I know that you can do this more efficiently.
I know you can do this more accurately, and if you're not doing that as best as possible, then I will look for alternatives. But they have huge incumbency advantages from that data and experience and knowledge and integration. That's really hard to replicate for either the dealers or for new upstarts.
I think what you do see that is for companies that don't have that level of dependency within the business, where people and processes aren't ingrained, where it doesn't have integrations with the data and core systems, where it's it's a pure interactive level and not really core to the to the underlying customer value.
I think that's the reality. And I know there are companies out there that that are facing those challenges.
00:32:36.130 — 00:32:46.050 · Speaker 1
How has all this changed how you're building the teams inside portfolio companies, or how you approach the overall management or org structure to to drive the most value?
00:32:46.570 — 00:34:17.620 · Speaker 2
There's more efficiency in a lot of our teams. That often means we invest in growth businesses. So these businesses are still growing their headcount because, you know, there's there's more that they can be doing. I think this creates additional opportunity to build product faster, to deliver greater results to customers.
But each of those individuals that we're adding can be incrementally more efficient product teams. Instead of having larger pods focused on fewer products, you can break down those pods to smaller teams. Product managers can be more integrated with developers and iterating back and forth, because you've unlocked that layer of who needs to be building code.
How you actually iterate on code. How you deliver that code. So processes are changing and you're seeing within development teams they can be focused on more at once within sales teams. You know there's more tools that are are able to make them more efficient. So you know DLRdmv, we brought on Gong and and that's making, uh, the sales team able to to go out to more prospects to, to convert on them faster, to have the right conversations, to deliver the right messaging.
Um, and that's super effective. But that doesn't mean we don't need more salespeople, right? Like, the dealer landscape is very much, uh, a person relationship business, and that still exists. So we're able to really supplement and improve our team. And that's really exciting for these businesses that can can move faster.
00:34:17.940 — 00:34:29.120 · Speaker 1
Yeah. That's awesome. I agree with everything you said. Unfortunately, coming up on time, I wish we could have kept going further here. But Jesse, if people want to learn more about you and Apax. What's the best way for them to do that?
00:34:29.159 — 00:35:07.080 · Speaker 2
Yeah, I mean, we're always looking to meet people who are excited about the same opportunities we are. As I said, our fund looks at tech and tech enabled services. I specifically got focus on real asset areas. So proptech, auto tech, construction, industrial manufacturing, um, my email's [email protected] and people can feel free to reach out.
Um, we love to have conversations and just talk about how the world is changing, how we're thinking about opportunities within businesses that are more exciting than ever right now. Um, so, you know, we're we're excited to to be out there and meeting all those that are, are kind of in the same boat.
00:35:07.360 — 00:35:27.730 · Speaker 1
Awesome. We'll be sure to include all of that and all the links in the show notes. And with that said, Jesse, thanks for coming on and sharing how Apax Digital structures this team and creates all this value. I think it's rare in the PE world that there's a team such as this that's adding a bunch of value for their portfolio company, so I hope the investors and other GP's that listen to this podcast We'll learn from it as much as I did.
So I appreciate you doing this.
00:35:27.890 — 00:35:30.690 · Speaker 2
I appreciate you having me, and it's a fun conversation.
00:35:31.650 — 00:36:21.050 · Speaker 1
Thanks for listening to today's episode. Before you take off just a few requests from our side. Number one, if you haven't done so already, please subscribe to the podcast on iTunes or Spotify or YouTube or wherever you go to listen to your podcasts. Number two, if you are in the market for due diligence services, strategy consulting or fractional CMO services, please get in touch with us at howtosaas.com and third, please buy a copy of my new book, Exit Ready Marketing. It covers a ton of concepts that we take our customers through private equity investors, B2B companies, CEOs, operating partners, and marketers. And there's a ton of great value in there that expands on my previous book post acquisition marketing as well.
So with that said, I hope you enjoyed today's content and we'll see you on the next episode.
Suggested Episodes
Ep.146: Shiv Narayanan of How To SaaS
Developing a GTM Strategy to Expand Geographically
Learn how to approach international and regional expansion as a growth lever.
Ep.147: Mike Esposito of Franchise Equity Partners
Box Economics and Multi-Unit Franchise Investing
Learn why multi-unit franchise investing has stayed an underserved niche in private equity.
Ep.148: Dustin Ackerman of Future StandardÂ
Mid-Market Secondaries and Growth at a Reasonable Price
Learn about secondaries and backing GPs, including turning existing sponsor relationships into an investment pipeline.
If you found this episode helpful, please leave us a rating or review on your podcast platform.
Sign up to get more episodes like this direct to your inbox